Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 1744 days newer than Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i7-2600 - 233 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i7-2600
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
