Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1240 v5 is 540 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 1600 - 253 vs 245 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
