Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 112 vs 102 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
