Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1230 v5 outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 v5 is 1655 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Pentium Gold G6400 - 174 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1230 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
805
63.03837118245889%
Multi-Core
1669
39.947343226424124%
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
