Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1230 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1230 v3 is 2136 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 102 vs 98 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |