Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1225 - 268 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
100%
Price, £
£125
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |