Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1225 - 181 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£160.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £160.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |