Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 80 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 209 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1225 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i5-13600KF
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Single-Core
1217
44.30287586457954%
Multi-Core
3420
22.186182289977292%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
