Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 463 days older than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 84 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1103
100%
Multi-Core
3162
58.79509111193752%
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
80.32638259292838%
Multi-Core
5378
100%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
