Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 151 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1103
45.260566270004105%
Multi-Core
3162
25.458937198067634%
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
