Buy on Amazon
£204
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2908 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 189 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1220L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
