Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1220 - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£203
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £203 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |