Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2642 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 57% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 270 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
270
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£640.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £640.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10843 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |