Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v5 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v5 is 1141 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3330 - 169 vs 154 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 77 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
154
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 424 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |