Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 187 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |