Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 175 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 65 vs 69 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1220 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 69 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
