Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Ryzen 9 5900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 239 days newer than Ryzen 9 5900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 5900 - 123 vs 119 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Ryzen 9 5900
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5900
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Single-Core
2052
89.29503916449086%
Multi-Core
9865
98.71910337236065%
Intel Xeon E-2388G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
