Buy on Amazon
£299
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E-2286G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 526 days newer than Xeon E-2286G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2286G
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E-2286G - 142 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2286G - 32 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.11/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Processor (16Cores/32Threads, 105W TDP, Socket AM4, 72MB Cache, Up to 4.9 GHz Max Boost, no cooler)
Buy for £299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2286G
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2286G | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
