Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3347 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 88% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium P6200 - 400 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 48 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
400
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |