Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 946 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium P6200 - 115 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6200 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
115
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |