Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1801 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Pentium P6100 - 189 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |