Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 2061 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 58 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Pentium Gold G6400 - 299 vs 282 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |