Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 455 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Pentium G645T - 156 vs 150 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
