Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1824 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 17% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G645T - 103 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
30.39383561643836%
Multi-Core
606
10.459095616154643%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
