Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2125 days newer than Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in The Outer Worlds than Pentium G630 - 199 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 64 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |