Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2317 days newer than Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G4400 - 135 vs 121 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G4400
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
