Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2239 days newer than Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 61% better in The Callisto Protocol than Pentium G3420 - 124 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 20 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
584
37.055837563451774%
Multi-Core
981
10.468466545726177%
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |