Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 98 days newer than Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 53 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3258 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 24 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
