Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
