Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220T is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |