Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Pentium B950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 115 days newer than Pentium B950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium B950
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium B950 - 166 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium B950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
166
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£35.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium B950 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |