Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645T outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645T is 910 days older than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Pentium G645T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium 3825U - 166 vs 165 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Pentium 3825U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Pentium G645T
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Pentium |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
