Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 671 days older than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Pentium 3825U - 319 vs 313 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 6 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
319
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |