Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 3384 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 22% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 293 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 22 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Dec 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ultra 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
METEOR LAKE | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 2049 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
22 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |