Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1453 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 4 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Core M-5Y51 - 175 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 24 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
