Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2080 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 4 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 65% better in FIFA 23 than Core M-5Y51 - 185 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 24 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |