Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 724 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 58 vs 55 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9960X - 44 vs 32 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9960X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
85.26850507982583%
Multi-Core
9619
96.24774864918952%
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 22 |
| 32 | Threads | 44 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
