Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2146 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1620 - 161 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
28.032899246058946%
Multi-Core
723
6.7356064840693115%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
