Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 851 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 182 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
79.3010752688172%
Multi-Core
5480
57.58722152164775%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
