Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 654 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7350K - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 60 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
97.58064516129032%
Multi-Core
2873
30.191256830601095%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
