Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1783 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1820 - 243 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
32.997311827956985%
Multi-Core
825
8.669609079445145%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |