Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 1098 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 64 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 127 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 44 vs 16 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 2234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 22 |
16 | Threads | 44 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |