Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2633 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-2700K - 134 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £141.26 vs £328.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900KF - £1.26 vs £2.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.45/FPS
51%
Price, £
£328.88
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14330 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
112
83%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £141.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |