Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 735 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-7600K - 260 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £151.0 vs £328.88
- Up to 53% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-9900KF - £0.59 vs £1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 91 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
260
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
46%
Price, £
£328.88
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14142 minutes ago
Buy for £151 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |