Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-6600K - 167 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £138.88 vs £328.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-9900KF - £0.86 vs £1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 91 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.97/FPS
43%
Price, £
£328.88
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for £328.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14448 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
162
97%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |