Buy on Amazon
£300
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 798 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105F - 219 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £77.03 vs £300.0
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Intel Core i9-9900KF processor (16M cache, up to 5.00 GHz)
Buy for £300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76353 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £77.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-9900KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
85.98462448255471%
Multi-Core
4472
55.53209983856948%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
