Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 516 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 594 vs 530 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - £99.99 vs £300.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76521 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
89.22558922558923%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£99.99
100%
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
69.42637492607925%
Multi-Core
6976
86.62610207376133%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |