Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-6350 - 167 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - £39.99 vs £395.0
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76692 minutes ago
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |