Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - £5.56 vs £310.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £310 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76652 minutes ago
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76651 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.443202979515828%
Multi-Core
739
10.258189894503055%
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |