Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Core i3-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 157 days older than Core i3-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-8300 - 216 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 62 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1301
95.38123167155426%
Multi-Core
3825
42.02373104812129%
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 62 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |